Does anyone crave nonfiction?
I like philosophy, psychology, anthropology, ethnology, research, professional journnals, cosmology, theory, biography, neuroscience an so on...
anyone else here of a similar mind?
I like philosophy, psychology, anthropology, ethnology, research, professional journnals, cosmology, theory, biography, neuroscience an so on...
anyone else here of a similar mind?
-
Re: Non-fiction anyone?
Tue, December 25, 2007 - 5:37 PMYes, especially history and political philosophy. Unfortunately, I keep finding myself with the fiction because it is so much easier. Reading the good stuff is hard to do when you are tired. -
-
Re: Non-fiction anyone?
Thu, December 27, 2007 - 10:49 AMHi Palma! Hi Morgan! I would say that having books on the shelf add up! It's valuable even to hold a book in one's hand, scan the cover and cover art, flip through for maps and chapter headings, recognize why someone would have taken on conveying that information to an audience! I really feel empowered to look over a solid non-fiction book collection for placing oneself within the grand narrative of human events. Thanks for an interesting post!
-
-
Re: Non-fiction anyone?
Sun, January 6, 2008 - 9:50 AMCrave non-fiction? I am addicted to it. Writers like Erik Larsen and Sebastian Junger and Ben Macintyre are word for word more entertaining than most fiction writers. (Although A THOUSAND SPLENDID SUNS is one of the most stunning books I've ever read.) Check out IMPERIAL LIFE IN THE EMERALD CITY for an outrageous look at just how badly the diplomacy in Iraq is being handled. (And the book CHARLIE WILSON'S WAR is likewise fantastic.) I also
-
Re: Non-fiction anyone?
Mon, January 7, 2008 - 10:48 PMYou just described my non fic reading. Although history, psychology, biology, mythology, and evolution are probably the things i read most about.
-
Re: Non-fiction anyone?
Mon, January 21, 2008 - 12:54 AMIn my case, it's a mix of fiction/non-fiction at the 50/50 level. Fiction is the chocolate after a heavy meal, the fine wine sipped while listening to the stars twinkle, tickling my mind with strange tales from subtly different realities. And then there's non-fiction, the millstone honing the mind, trying to get it to go beyond its deeply worn paths to see connections. Mostly scientific explorations or popularizations, à la Douglas Hofstaedter or Jared Diamond; the cynic in me hasn't gotten around to enjoying historical or political non-fiction too much, since although those often represent excellent investigative journalism, I am not really sure which the intended audience is: those who have been following developments, and thus do not need to be convinced of the arguments, or those who will ignore all evidence, even if it is laid out in front of them.
I'm starting to be slightly frustrated in that regard - I'm constantly on the lookout for new areas to be amazed about, but short of reading the professional literature, it's cosmology, physics and neuroscience that get the bulk of the shelf space, and I feel like I've seen most of the authors. Surely other domains must have as fascinating a tale to tell? My recent excursions in reading a few philosophers of science have left me with a grumbling mind, hungry for more substantive nourishment ;)
